+67.8%
ZETA vs TRGP
+80.7%
-12.9%
-40.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | TRGP | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.1% | -1.2% | -2.9% | -4.2% |
| 7D | +2.7% | +0.8% | +1.9% | +2.7% |
| 30D | +15.8% | +11.5% | +4.3% | +16.7% |
| 3M | +35.4% | +9.0% | +26.4% | +35.8% |
| 6M | +67.1% | +20.5% | +46.6% | +63.9% |
| YTD | +54.1% | +59.5% | -5.5% | +38.5% |
| 1Y | +67.8% | +77.9% | -10.1% | +33.4% |
| All | +67.8% | +80.7% | -12.9% | +33.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside TRGP.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus TRGP return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × TRGP return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded TRGP wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling