+67.8%
ZETA vs SCHG
+16.6%
+51.2%
-40.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | SCHG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.1% | -0.9% | -3.2% | -2.3% |
| 7D | +2.7% | -0.7% | +3.4% | +4.2% |
| 30D | +15.8% | +0.2% | +15.6% | +15.7% |
| 3M | +35.4% | +2.2% | +33.2% | +30.5% |
| 6M | +67.1% | +15.0% | +52.1% | +25.2% |
| YTD | +54.1% | +9.2% | +44.9% | +30.6% |
| 1Y | +67.8% | +15.7% | +52.1% | +27.4% |
| All | +67.8% | +16.6% | +51.2% | +27.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside SCHG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus SCHG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × SCHG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded SCHG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling