+90.3%
ZETA vs PLTD
-16.1%
+106.4%
-40.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | PLTD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.6% | +2.4% | +0.2% | +3.9% |
| 7D | -5.0% | +14.4% | -19.4% | +2.3% |
| 30D | -3.3% | +8.6% | -12.0% | +1.8% |
| 3M | +31.0% | -9.2% | +40.2% | +27.9% |
| 6M | +72.2% | -29.5% | +101.7% | +59.5% |
| YTD | +56.2% | -20.2% | +76.4% | +59.2% |
| 1Y | +90.3% | -16.5% | +106.8% | +99.3% |
| All | +90.3% | -16.1% | +106.4% | +99.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PLTD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PLTD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PLTD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PLTD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling