+90.3%
ZETA vs NVT
+3.0%
+87.3%
-40.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NVT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.6% | -12.7% | +15.3% | +3.7% |
| 7D | -5.0% | -19.5% | +14.5% | -3.2% |
| 30D | -3.3% | -32.4% | +29.1% | -0.2% |
| 3M | +31.0% | -30.3% | +61.3% | +34.7% |
| 6M | +72.2% | -30.4% | +102.6% | +74.0% |
| YTD | +56.2% | +11.3% | +44.8% | +23.3% |
| 1Y | +90.3% | +3.6% | +86.7% | +65.2% |
| All | +90.3% | +3.0% | +87.3% | +65.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NVT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NVT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NVT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NVT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling