+67.8%
ZETA vs NTRA
+96.0%
-28.2%
-40.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NTRA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.1% | +0.2% | -4.2% | -4.1% |
| 7D | +2.7% | +0.6% | +2.1% | +2.4% |
| 30D | +15.8% | +19.5% | -3.7% | +6.8% |
| 3M | +35.4% | +47.8% | -12.3% | +11.7% |
| 6M | +67.1% | +61.6% | +5.5% | +27.7% |
| YTD | +54.1% | +43.3% | +10.8% | +25.2% |
| 1Y | +67.8% | +97.0% | -29.2% | +8.9% |
| All | +67.8% | +96.0% | -28.2% | +8.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NTRA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NTRA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NTRA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NTRA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling