+90.3%
ZETA vs MKC
-18.2%
+108.5%
-40.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | MKC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.6% | +5.4% | -2.8% | +3.5% |
| 7D | -5.0% | +9.6% | -14.6% | -3.4% |
| 30D | -3.3% | +12.0% | -15.4% | -1.3% |
| 3M | +31.0% | -2.0% | +33.0% | +31.4% |
| 6M | +72.2% | +7.2% | +65.0% | +76.2% |
| YTD | +56.2% | -23.7% | +79.9% | +38.4% |
| 1Y | +90.3% | -18.3% | +108.6% | +68.3% |
| All | +90.3% | -18.2% | +108.5% | +68.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MKC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MKC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MKC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MKC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling