+67.8%
ZETA vs MKC
-23.4%
+91.2%
-40.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | MKC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.1% | -1.0% | -3.1% | -4.2% |
| 7D | +2.7% | -5.9% | +8.5% | +1.9% |
| 30D | +15.8% | -0.9% | +16.7% | +15.8% |
| 3M | +35.4% | +12.7% | +22.7% | +39.8% |
| 6M | +67.1% | -19.3% | +86.4% | +50.6% |
| YTD | +54.1% | -22.2% | +76.2% | +39.6% |
| 1Y | +67.8% | -23.3% | +91.2% | +53.9% |
| All | +67.8% | -23.4% | +91.2% | +53.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MKC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MKC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MKC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MKC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling