+90.3%
ZETA vs LNT
+13.9%
+76.4%
-40.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | LNT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.6% | +2.3% | +0.3% | +4.2% |
| 7D | -5.0% | +7.2% | -12.1% | -0.2% |
| 30D | -3.3% | +15.6% | -19.0% | +7.0% |
| 3M | +31.0% | +5.2% | +25.8% | +36.6% |
| 6M | +72.2% | +1.7% | +70.5% | +76.9% |
| YTD | +56.2% | +17.0% | +39.2% | +70.7% |
| 1Y | +90.3% | +14.2% | +76.1% | +113.2% |
| All | +90.3% | +13.9% | +76.4% | +113.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LNT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LNT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LNT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LNT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling