+67.8%
ZETA vs LII
-28.2%
+96.0%
-40.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | LII | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.1% | +1.2% | -5.2% | -4.3% |
| 7D | +2.7% | -0.7% | +3.4% | +2.8% |
| 30D | +15.8% | -12.6% | +28.4% | +19.3% |
| 3M | +35.4% | -24.4% | +59.9% | +40.9% |
| 6M | +67.1% | -28.7% | +95.8% | +76.7% |
| YTD | +54.1% | -19.1% | +73.2% | +49.8% |
| 1Y | +67.8% | -29.7% | +97.5% | +70.2% |
| All | +67.8% | -28.2% | +96.0% | +70.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LII.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LII return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LII return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LII wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling