+67.8%
ZETA vs LHX
-4.7%
+72.5%
-40.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | LHX | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.1% | -2.2% | -1.9% | -3.5% |
| 7D | +2.7% | -2.4% | +5.1% | +3.4% |
| 30D | +15.8% | -10.4% | +26.2% | +19.2% |
| 3M | +35.4% | -16.9% | +52.3% | +42.1% |
| 6M | +67.1% | -29.9% | +97.0% | +84.1% |
| YTD | +54.1% | -12.0% | +66.0% | +55.1% |
| 1Y | +67.8% | -4.5% | +72.4% | +63.7% |
| All | +67.8% | -4.7% | +72.5% | +63.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LHX.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LHX return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LHX return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LHX wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling