+90.3%
ZETA vs FWONK
+0.2%
+90.1%
-40.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | FWONK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.6% | +3.5% | -0.9% | +1.8% |
| 7D | -5.0% | +8.9% | -13.9% | -6.9% |
| 30D | -3.3% | +4.1% | -7.5% | -4.3% |
| 3M | +31.0% | +2.6% | +28.4% | +29.9% |
| 6M | +72.2% | +12.2% | +60.0% | +68.6% |
| YTD | +56.2% | +0.4% | +55.7% | +56.8% |
| 1Y | +90.3% | -1.8% | +92.1% | +112.8% |
| All | +90.3% | +0.2% | +90.1% | +112.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FWONK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FWONK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FWONK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FWONK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling