+90.3%
ZETA vs FROG
+83.7%
+6.6%
-40.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | FROG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.6% | -2.4% | +5.0% | +3.2% |
| 7D | -5.0% | -14.1% | +9.1% | -1.3% |
| 30D | -3.3% | -11.8% | +8.4% | -0.5% |
| 3M | +31.0% | +0.1% | +30.9% | +30.1% |
| 6M | +72.2% | +64.2% | +7.9% | +55.0% |
| YTD | +56.2% | +38.2% | +17.9% | +37.7% |
| 1Y | +90.3% | +85.4% | +4.9% | +67.5% |
| All | +90.3% | +83.7% | +6.6% | +67.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FROG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FROG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FROG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FROG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling