+90.3%
ZETA vs FLNC
-69.0%
+159.3%
-40.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | FLNC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.6% | +10.2% | -7.6% | +1.4% |
| 7D | -5.0% | -2.1% | -2.9% | -4.8% |
| 30D | -3.3% | -20.8% | +17.4% | -1.0% |
| 3M | +31.0% | -61.3% | +92.3% | +45.0% |
| 6M | +72.2% | -50.9% | +123.0% | +74.0% |
| YTD | +56.2% | -69.4% | +125.5% | +67.1% |
| 1Y | +90.3% | -68.4% | +158.7% | +96.1% |
| All | +90.3% | -69.0% | +159.3% | +96.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FLNC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FLNC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FLNC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FLNC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling