+67.8%
ZETA vs FLNC
+53.3%
+14.5%
-40.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | FLNC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.1% | +1.5% | -5.5% | -4.2% |
| 7D | +2.7% | -4.9% | +7.5% | +3.2% |
| 30D | +15.8% | -27.3% | +43.1% | +19.9% |
| 3M | +35.4% | -61.9% | +97.3% | +49.6% |
| 6M | +67.1% | -34.5% | +101.6% | +67.3% |
| YTD | +54.1% | -47.7% | +101.7% | +57.6% |
| 1Y | +67.8% | +53.3% | +14.5% | +48.9% |
| All | +67.8% | +53.3% | +14.5% | +48.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FLNC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FLNC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FLNC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FLNC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling