+67.8%
ZETA vs FITB
+23.7%
+44.2%
-40.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | FITB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.1% | -0.2% | -3.9% | -4.0% |
| 7D | +2.7% | +0.6% | +2.0% | +2.2% |
| 30D | +15.8% | -4.7% | +20.6% | +19.3% |
| 3M | +35.4% | +6.7% | +28.7% | +28.8% |
| 6M | +67.1% | +12.6% | +54.6% | +51.3% |
| YTD | +54.1% | +19.1% | +34.9% | +31.4% |
| 1Y | +67.8% | +22.6% | +45.2% | +30.2% |
| All | +67.8% | +23.7% | +44.2% | +30.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FITB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FITB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FITB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FITB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling