+90.3%
ZETA vs FANG
+32.3%
+58.0%
-40.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | FANG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.6% | -4.9% | +7.5% | +1.3% |
| 7D | -5.0% | -11.3% | +6.3% | -7.9% |
| 30D | -3.3% | -0.7% | -2.7% | -3.1% |
| 3M | +31.0% | -4.2% | +35.2% | +31.0% |
| 6M | +72.2% | -13.5% | +85.6% | +66.4% |
| YTD | +56.2% | +23.7% | +32.4% | +79.8% |
| 1Y | +90.3% | +34.3% | +56.0% | +129.9% |
| All | +90.3% | +32.3% | +58.0% | +129.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FANG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FANG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FANG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FANG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling