+67.8%
ZETA vs CG
-24.3%
+92.1%
-40.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | CG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.1% | -1.6% | -2.4% | -2.8% |
| 7D | +2.7% | -4.3% | +7.0% | +6.0% |
| 30D | +15.8% | -5.1% | +20.9% | +20.2% |
| 3M | +35.4% | +8.7% | +26.7% | +25.4% |
| 6M | +67.1% | -9.2% | +76.3% | +80.0% |
| YTD | +54.1% | -18.9% | +72.9% | +84.8% |
| 1Y | +67.8% | -25.6% | +93.5% | +110.4% |
| All | +67.8% | -24.3% | +92.1% | +110.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside CG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus CG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × CG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded CG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling