+67.8%
ZETA vs BLDR
-52.1%
+119.9%
-40.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | BLDR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.1% | +2.5% | -6.6% | -4.9% |
| 7D | +2.7% | -2.8% | +5.5% | +3.5% |
| 30D | +15.8% | -13.3% | +29.1% | +21.1% |
| 3M | +35.4% | -12.3% | +47.7% | +38.2% |
| 6M | +67.1% | -31.5% | +98.6% | +91.0% |
| YTD | +54.1% | -36.1% | +90.1% | +78.1% |
| 1Y | +67.8% | -54.1% | +121.9% | +128.2% |
| All | +67.8% | -52.1% | +119.9% | +128.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BLDR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BLDR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BLDR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BLDR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling