+67.8%
ZETA vs BHP
+65.8%
+2.1%
-40.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | BHP | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.1% | -2.5% | -1.6% | -3.0% |
| 7D | +2.7% | -5.0% | +7.6% | +4.8% |
| 30D | +15.8% | +1.2% | +14.6% | +14.9% |
| 3M | +35.4% | +1.8% | +33.6% | +33.9% |
| 6M | +67.1% | +18.0% | +49.1% | +51.8% |
| YTD | +54.1% | +52.7% | +1.3% | +11.4% |
| 1Y | +67.8% | +66.0% | +1.8% | +11.3% |
| All | +67.8% | +65.8% | +2.1% | +11.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BHP.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BHP return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BHP return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BHP wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling