+90.3%
ZETA vs BBIO
+26.8%
+63.5%
-40.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | BBIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.6% | +5.2% | -2.6% | +2.0% |
| 7D | -5.0% | +10.0% | -15.0% | -6.1% |
| 30D | -3.3% | +17.8% | -21.1% | -5.4% |
| 3M | +31.0% | -5.1% | +36.1% | +32.1% |
| 6M | +72.2% | +12.9% | +59.3% | +68.1% |
| YTD | +56.2% | +1.8% | +54.3% | +56.5% |
| 1Y | +90.3% | +26.9% | +63.4% | +56.0% |
| All | +90.3% | +26.8% | +63.5% | +56.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BBIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BBIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BBIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BBIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling