+67.8%
ZETA vs AZO
-28.9%
+96.7%
-40.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | AZO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.1% | +0.5% | -4.6% | -4.1% |
| 7D | +2.7% | +0.7% | +1.9% | +2.6% |
| 30D | +15.8% | -2.7% | +18.5% | +16.1% |
| 3M | +35.4% | -3.2% | +38.6% | +35.4% |
| 6M | +67.1% | -19.7% | +86.9% | +63.4% |
| YTD | +54.1% | -12.0% | +66.1% | +53.8% |
| 1Y | +67.8% | -29.5% | +97.3% | +68.2% |
| All | +67.8% | -28.9% | +96.7% | +68.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside AZO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus AZO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × AZO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded AZO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling