+67.8%
ZETA vs ARMK
+47.4%
+20.4%
-40.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ARMK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.1% | -0.9% | -3.2% | -3.5% |
| 7D | +2.7% | -2.4% | +5.1% | +4.2% |
| 30D | +15.8% | 0.0% | +15.8% | +15.5% |
| 3M | +35.4% | +6.7% | +28.8% | +29.3% |
| 6M | +67.1% | +38.8% | +28.3% | +31.3% |
| YTD | +54.1% | +55.2% | -1.1% | +7.6% |
| 1Y | +67.8% | +46.6% | +21.2% | +26.3% |
| All | +67.8% | +47.4% | +20.4% | +26.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ARMK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ARMK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ARMK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ARMK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling