-99.9%
ZCMD vs VICR
+272.1%
-372.0%
-99.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | VICR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.7% | +5.5% | -9.2% | -5.6% |
| 7D | -8.0% | +0.4% | -8.4% | -8.3% |
| 30D | -27.9% | -13.9% | -13.9% | -24.7% |
| 3M | -74.6% | -38.4% | -36.2% | -71.0% |
| 6M | -99.5% | -7.2% | -92.2% | -99.4% |
| YTD | -99.7% | +72.0% | -171.8% | -99.8% |
| 1Y | -99.9% | +263.3% | -363.2% | -99.9% |
| All | -99.9% | +272.1% | -372.0% | -99.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside VICR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus VICR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × VICR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded VICR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling