-99.9%
ZCMD vs TCOM
-39.6%
-60.3%
-99.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | TCOM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.0% | +3.2% | -6.2% | -2.1% |
| 7D | -13.3% | +10.7% | -24.0% | -10.6% |
| 30D | -49.6% | +10.1% | -59.7% | -48.1% |
| 3M | -54.6% | -8.9% | -45.8% | -55.7% |
| 6M | -99.8% | -19.2% | -80.6% | -99.8% |
| YTD | -99.9% | -40.6% | -59.2% | -99.8% |
| 1Y | -99.9% | -39.0% | -60.9% | -99.9% |
| All | -99.9% | -39.6% | -60.3% | -99.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside TCOM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus TCOM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × TCOM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded TCOM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling