-99.9%
ZCMD vs SSNC
-3.9%
-96.0%
-99.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | SSNC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.0% | -1.6% | -1.4% | -4.9% |
| 7D | -13.3% | -1.1% | -12.2% | -14.3% |
| 30D | -49.6% | +0.6% | -50.2% | -48.7% |
| 3M | -54.6% | -1.5% | -53.1% | -54.6% |
| 6M | -99.8% | +15.8% | -115.6% | -99.7% |
| YTD | -99.9% | -8.0% | -91.9% | -99.8% |
| 1Y | -99.9% | -5.8% | -94.1% | -99.9% |
| All | -99.9% | -3.9% | -96.0% | -99.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside SSNC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus SSNC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × SSNC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded SSNC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling