-99.9%
ZCMD vs KIM
+9.1%
-109.0%
-99.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | KIM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.8% | -1.3% | -2.4% | -3.7% |
| 7D | -8.0% | -0.8% | -7.3% | -8.0% |
| 30D | -27.9% | -5.1% | -22.8% | -27.8% |
| 3M | -74.6% | -0.6% | -74.0% | -75.8% |
| 6M | -99.5% | +2.4% | -101.9% | -99.5% |
| YTD | -99.7% | +19.0% | -118.8% | -99.8% |
| 1Y | -99.9% | +8.4% | -108.3% | -99.9% |
| All | -99.9% | +9.1% | -109.0% | -99.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside KIM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus KIM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × KIM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded KIM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling