-99.9%
ZCMD vs BBIO
+44.0%
-143.9%
-99.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | BBIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.8% | -0.8% | -3.0% | -3.7% |
| 7D | -8.0% | -2.3% | -5.7% | -7.7% |
| 30D | -27.9% | -8.7% | -19.2% | -27.0% |
| 3M | -74.6% | +11.2% | -85.7% | -75.5% |
| 6M | -99.5% | +12.5% | -111.9% | -99.5% |
| YTD | -99.7% | -2.2% | -97.6% | -99.7% |
| 1Y | -99.9% | +44.4% | -144.3% | -99.9% |
| All | -99.9% | +44.0% | -143.9% | -99.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BBIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BBIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BBIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BBIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling