-99.9%
ZCMD vs ALHC
-16.6%
-83.3%
-99.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ALHC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.8% | 0.0% | -3.7% | -3.7% |
| 7D | -8.0% | -0.6% | -7.4% | -7.9% |
| 30D | -27.9% | -1.0% | -26.9% | -28.0% |
| 3M | -74.6% | -10.2% | -64.4% | -77.4% |
| 6M | -99.5% | -28.3% | -71.2% | -99.4% |
| YTD | -99.7% | -31.4% | -68.3% | -99.7% |
| 1Y | -99.9% | -16.9% | -83.0% | -99.9% |
| All | -99.9% | -16.6% | -83.3% | -99.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ALHC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ALHC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ALHC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ALHC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling