-99.9%
ZCMD vs ALHC
-51.4%
-48.5%
-99.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ALHC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.0% | +10.1% | -13.2% | -3.8% |
| 7D | -13.3% | -0.5% | -12.8% | -13.5% |
| 30D | -49.6% | -4.2% | -45.4% | -49.6% |
| 3M | -54.6% | -39.8% | -14.8% | -52.1% |
| 6M | -99.8% | -57.7% | -42.0% | -99.7% |
| YTD | -99.9% | -58.8% | -41.1% | -99.8% |
| 1Y | -99.9% | -52.4% | -47.5% | -99.9% |
| All | -99.9% | -51.4% | -48.5% | -99.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ALHC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ALHC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ALHC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ALHC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling