-99.9%
ZCMD vs ABCL
+186.8%
-286.7%
-99.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ABCL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.8% | -1.2% | -2.5% | -4.0% |
| 7D | -8.0% | +0.7% | -8.7% | -7.9% |
| 30D | -27.9% | +93.1% | -121.0% | -13.7% |
| 3M | -74.6% | +79.4% | -154.0% | -70.2% |
| 6M | -99.5% | +214.9% | -314.3% | -99.4% |
| YTD | -99.7% | +234.2% | -334.0% | -99.7% |
| 1Y | -99.9% | +174.8% | -274.6% | -99.9% |
| All | -99.9% | +186.8% | -286.7% | -99.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ABCL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ABCL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ABCL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ABCL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling