+27.7%
ZBRA vs UMAC
+2.9%
+24.8%
-27.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.9% | -10.9% | +11.8% | +1.4% |
| 7D | -13.6% | -26.0% | +12.5% | -12.4% |
| 30D | -11.5% | -40.3% | +28.8% | -9.6% |
| 3M | -9.9% | -51.1% | +41.3% | -7.4% |
| 6M | +48.6% | -5.6% | +54.2% | +50.0% |
| YTD | +36.9% | +2.3% | +34.6% | +33.8% |
| 1Y | +27.7% | +7.9% | +19.8% | +24.7% |
| All | +27.7% | +2.9% | +24.8% | +24.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling