+16.5%
ZBRA vs NIO
-37.4%
+53.9%
-38.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.5% | -1.6% | +3.0% | +1.6% |
| 7D | +1.8% | -13.0% | +14.8% | +3.1% |
| 30D | -1.7% | -18.3% | +16.6% | +0.2% |
| 3M | +47.8% | -33.2% | +81.0% | +53.4% |
| 6M | +56.7% | -21.5% | +78.2% | +58.1% |
| YTD | +49.4% | -25.5% | +74.9% | +51.6% |
| 1Y | +16.5% | -38.0% | +54.6% | +26.2% |
| All | +16.5% | -37.4% | +53.9% | +26.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling