+27.7%
ZBRA vs NIO
-54.1%
+81.8%
-27.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.9% | +3.4% | -2.6% | +0.6% |
| 7D | -13.6% | -0.6% | -13.0% | -13.5% |
| 30D | -11.5% | -3.5% | -8.0% | -11.3% |
| 3M | -9.9% | -30.7% | +20.8% | -8.0% |
| 6M | +48.6% | -45.6% | +94.2% | +53.2% |
| YTD | +36.9% | -35.3% | +72.2% | +40.3% |
| 1Y | +27.7% | -53.9% | +81.6% | +43.6% |
| All | +27.7% | -54.1% | +81.8% | +43.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling