+7.9%
ZBH vs LDOS
-27.6%
+35.5%
-22.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | LDOS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +13.5% | +0.7% | +12.8% | +13.4% |
| 7D | +14.3% | -2.8% | +17.1% | +14.6% |
| 30D | +20.3% | +13.6% | +6.7% | +18.5% |
| 3M | +15.3% | +4.2% | +11.0% | +14.6% |
| 6M | +33.9% | -8.2% | +42.2% | +33.7% |
| YTD | +23.5% | -24.1% | +47.6% | +20.0% |
| 1Y | +7.9% | -31.2% | +39.1% | +17.3% |
| All | +7.9% | -27.6% | +35.5% | +17.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LDOS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LDOS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LDOS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LDOS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling