+47.6%
XOP vs NIO
-37.4%
+85.0%
-18.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.8% | -1.6% | +0.7% | -0.8% |
| 7D | +2.6% | -13.0% | +15.6% | +2.6% |
| 30D | +15.4% | -18.3% | +33.7% | +15.6% |
| 3M | +12.1% | -33.2% | +45.3% | +12.1% |
| 6M | +19.7% | -21.5% | +41.2% | +19.0% |
| YTD | +52.4% | -25.5% | +77.9% | +51.9% |
| 1Y | +47.6% | -38.0% | +85.6% | +53.9% |
| All | +47.6% | -37.4% | +85.0% | +53.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling