+32.9%
XLV vs HTZ
-60.6%
+93.5%
-10.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | HTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.1% | +9.2% | -6.1% | +2.8% |
| 7D | +5.5% | +18.9% | -13.4% | +5.1% |
| 30D | +13.3% | +26.3% | -12.9% | +12.6% |
| 3M | +17.4% | +49.7% | -32.2% | +15.9% |
| 6M | +32.1% | -61.1% | +93.2% | +36.1% |
| YTD | +24.0% | -56.0% | +80.1% | +25.9% |
| 1Y | +32.9% | -66.4% | +99.3% | +38.9% |
| All | +32.9% | -60.6% | +93.5% | +38.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling