+43.4%
XLK vs ECHO
+40.1%
+3.2%
-15.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ECHO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.7% | 0.0% | +0.7% | +0.7% |
| 7D | +0.9% | +3.4% | -2.6% | +0.4% |
| 30D | +0.7% | +2.4% | -1.6% | +0.4% |
| 3M | -2.9% | -28.0% | +25.0% | +0.3% |
| 6M | +34.3% | -21.2% | +55.5% | +36.6% |
| YTD | +30.4% | -17.4% | +47.8% | +31.9% |
| 1Y | +43.4% | +33.6% | +9.8% | +40.3% |
| All | +43.4% | +40.1% | +3.2% | +40.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ECHO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ECHO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ECHO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ECHO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling