+9.1%
XLF vs ECHO
+40.1%
-31.0%
-14.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ECHO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.8% | 0.0% | -0.8% | -0.8% |
| 7D | 0.0% | +3.4% | -3.4% | -0.1% |
| 30D | +0.2% | +2.4% | -2.2% | +0.1% |
| 3M | +11.7% | -28.0% | +39.7% | +12.5% |
| 6M | +13.8% | -21.2% | +35.0% | +14.1% |
| YTD | +7.0% | -17.4% | +24.4% | +6.7% |
| 1Y | +9.1% | +33.6% | -24.5% | +6.9% |
| All | +9.1% | +40.1% | -31.0% | +6.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ECHO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ECHO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ECHO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ECHO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling