+86.1%
WULF vs ZETA
+68.7%
+17.4%
-49.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZETA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.7% | -4.1% | +5.8% | +2.6% |
| 7D | +7.6% | +2.7% | +4.9% | +6.9% |
| 30D | -8.6% | +15.8% | -24.4% | -11.8% |
| 3M | -37.0% | +35.4% | -72.4% | -41.6% |
| 6M | +7.4% | +67.1% | -59.7% | -8.0% |
| YTD | +43.7% | +54.1% | -10.4% | +22.7% |
| 1Y | +86.1% | +67.8% | +18.3% | +55.6% |
| All | +86.1% | +68.7% | +17.4% | +55.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZETA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZETA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZETA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZETA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling