+86.1%
WULF vs RGEN
+45.2%
+40.9%
-49.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | RGEN | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.7% | -1.2% | +2.9% | +2.0% |
| 7D | +7.6% | -4.9% | +12.5% | +8.6% |
| 30D | -8.6% | +5.7% | -14.3% | -9.4% |
| 3M | -37.0% | +32.4% | -69.4% | -40.9% |
| 6M | +7.4% | +33.2% | -25.8% | -0.5% |
| YTD | +43.7% | +2.3% | +41.4% | +37.3% |
| 1Y | +86.1% | +39.0% | +47.1% | +84.6% |
| All | +86.1% | +45.2% | +40.9% | +84.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside RGEN.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus RGEN return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × RGEN return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded RGEN wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling