+86.1%
WULF vs PENG
+118.5%
-32.4%
-49.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | PENG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.7% | +6.4% | -4.7% | -1.4% |
| 7D | +7.6% | +4.5% | +3.0% | +5.3% |
| 30D | -8.6% | -7.1% | -1.5% | -5.7% |
| 3M | -37.0% | -27.3% | -9.7% | -29.9% |
| 6M | +7.4% | +169.6% | -162.2% | -41.8% |
| YTD | +43.7% | +164.6% | -120.9% | -22.9% |
| 1Y | +86.1% | +109.5% | -23.3% | +6.0% |
| All | +86.1% | +118.5% | -32.4% | +6.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PENG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PENG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PENG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PENG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling