+86.1%
WULF vs LULU
-49.9%
+136.1%
-49.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | LULU | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.7% | -17.4% | +19.1% | +2.9% |
| 7D | +7.6% | -16.7% | +24.3% | +8.7% |
| 30D | -8.6% | -18.5% | +9.9% | -7.4% |
| 3M | -37.0% | -19.5% | -17.5% | -35.7% |
| 6M | +7.4% | -41.9% | +49.3% | +13.7% |
| YTD | +43.7% | -51.6% | +95.3% | +52.1% |
| 1Y | +86.1% | -51.2% | +137.3% | +93.2% |
| All | +86.1% | -49.9% | +136.1% | +93.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LULU.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LULU return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LULU return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LULU wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling