+86.1%
WULF vs CMS
-1.9%
+88.0%
-49.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | CMS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.7% | -0.2% | +1.9% | +1.7% |
| 7D | +7.6% | +0.4% | +7.2% | +7.7% |
| 30D | -8.6% | -3.6% | -5.0% | -10.1% |
| 3M | -37.0% | -1.9% | -35.0% | -39.2% |
| 6M | +7.4% | -11.0% | +18.4% | +5.2% |
| YTD | +43.7% | +0.2% | +43.5% | +46.3% |
| 1Y | +86.1% | -1.3% | +87.4% | +92.1% |
| All | +86.1% | -1.9% | +88.0% | +92.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside CMS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus CMS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × CMS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded CMS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling