-22.1%
WULF vs BIYA
-98.4%
+76.3%
-62.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | BIYA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -6.6% | -3.3% | -3.4% | -6.7% |
| 7D | -12.8% | -4.0% | -8.8% | -12.9% |
| 30D | -20.9% | -15.0% | -5.9% | -20.6% |
| 3M | -38.0% | -58.1% | +20.1% | -39.4% |
| 6M | -47.5% | -90.0% | +42.5% | -48.4% |
| YTD | +1.8% | -96.9% | +98.8% | +1.9% |
| 1Y | -22.1% | -98.2% | +76.2% | -22.9% |
| All | -22.1% | -98.4% | +76.3% | -22.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BIYA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BIYA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BIYA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BIYA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling