+2.5%
WFC vs NIO
-54.1%
+56.6%
-23.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.2% | +3.4% | -1.2% | +2.2% |
| 7D | +4.5% | -0.6% | +5.1% | +4.5% |
| 30D | +7.4% | -3.5% | +10.9% | +7.3% |
| 3M | -0.5% | -30.7% | +30.2% | -0.5% |
| 6M | +11.7% | -45.6% | +57.3% | +12.2% |
| YTD | -4.6% | -35.3% | +30.6% | -5.3% |
| 1Y | +2.5% | -53.9% | +56.4% | +5.2% |
| All | +2.5% | -54.1% | +56.6% | +5.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling