+12.3%
WFC vs ECHO
+40.1%
-27.8%
-23.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ECHO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.9% | 0.0% | +0.9% | +0.9% |
| 7D | +3.8% | +3.4% | +0.4% | +3.7% |
| 30D | +1.5% | +2.4% | -0.9% | +1.4% |
| 3M | +10.9% | -28.0% | +38.8% | +11.6% |
| 6M | +8.4% | -21.2% | +29.7% | +8.4% |
| YTD | -1.9% | -17.4% | +15.5% | -2.8% |
| 1Y | +12.3% | +33.6% | -21.2% | +8.5% |
| All | +12.3% | +40.1% | -27.8% | +8.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ECHO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ECHO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ECHO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ECHO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling