+36.5%
WELL vs GLDM
+2.8%
+33.7%
-12.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | GLDM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.8% | +3.7% | -0.8% | +3.0% |
| 7D | +9.2% | -0.3% | +9.4% | +9.1% |
| 30D | +10.6% | -1.9% | +12.5% | +10.5% |
| 3M | +7.5% | -0.4% | +7.9% | +7.5% |
| 6M | +15.0% | -10.1% | +25.1% | +14.9% |
| YTD | +35.0% | -5.8% | +40.9% | +38.5% |
| 1Y | +36.5% | +3.1% | +33.4% | +40.5% |
| All | +36.5% | +2.8% | +33.7% | +40.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLDM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLDM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLDM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLDM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling