+417.4%
WDC vs IBM
-1.8%
+419.2%
-41.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | IBM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.9% | +0.1% | +5.8% | +5.9% |
| 7D | +1.7% | -0.3% | +2.0% | +1.7% |
| 30D | -10.0% | +0.3% | -10.2% | -9.9% |
| 3M | -18.8% | -21.6% | +2.9% | -16.7% |
| 6M | +79.0% | -4.7% | +83.7% | +78.0% |
| YTD | +171.6% | -19.1% | +190.6% | +177.6% |
| 1Y | +417.4% | -2.5% | +419.9% | +446.1% |
| All | +417.4% | -1.8% | +419.2% | +446.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside IBM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus IBM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × IBM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded IBM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling