+30.6%
UPS vs NIO
-54.1%
+84.7%
-20.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.7% | +3.4% | +1.3% | +4.7% |
| 7D | +8.2% | -0.6% | +8.8% | +8.2% |
| 30D | +22.7% | -3.5% | +26.2% | +22.7% |
| 3M | +6.4% | -30.7% | +37.1% | +6.7% |
| 6M | +22.6% | -45.6% | +68.2% | +23.4% |
| YTD | +20.7% | -35.3% | +56.0% | +21.2% |
| 1Y | +30.6% | -53.9% | +84.5% | +36.5% |
| All | +30.6% | -54.1% | +84.7% | +36.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling