+29.0%
UPS vs NIO
-37.4%
+66.4%
-19.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.2% | -1.6% | +0.4% | -1.1% |
| 7D | -2.9% | -13.0% | +10.2% | -2.7% |
| 30D | -3.5% | -18.3% | +14.8% | -3.2% |
| 3M | -5.7% | -33.2% | +27.5% | -4.9% |
| 6M | -4.4% | -21.5% | +17.1% | -4.1% |
| YTD | +8.0% | -25.5% | +33.5% | +8.5% |
| 1Y | +29.0% | -38.0% | +67.0% | +32.5% |
| All | +29.0% | -37.4% | +66.4% | +32.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling