+30.6%
UPS vs FLNC
-69.0%
+99.6%
-20.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | FLNC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.7% | +10.2% | -5.5% | +4.3% |
| 7D | +8.2% | -2.1% | +10.3% | +8.2% |
| 30D | +22.7% | -20.8% | +43.5% | +23.5% |
| 3M | +6.4% | -61.3% | +67.8% | +9.7% |
| 6M | +22.6% | -50.9% | +73.5% | +26.6% |
| YTD | +20.7% | -69.4% | +90.1% | +24.0% |
| 1Y | +30.6% | -68.4% | +99.0% | +34.8% |
| All | +30.6% | -69.0% | +99.6% | +34.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FLNC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FLNC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FLNC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FLNC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling