+207.2%
UMC vs VIK
+37.7%
+169.5%
-37.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | VIK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.6% | +0.3% | +4.3% | +4.5% |
| 7D | +5.0% | -3.0% | +8.0% | +6.0% |
| 30D | +7.7% | -20.7% | +28.4% | +16.5% |
| 3M | +1.7% | -4.6% | +6.3% | +4.0% |
| 6M | +113.9% | +14.0% | +99.9% | +111.7% |
| YTD | +168.9% | +20.2% | +148.7% | +169.6% |
| 1Y | +207.2% | +36.0% | +171.2% | +199.1% |
| All | +207.2% | +37.7% | +169.5% | +199.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside VIK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus VIK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × VIK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded VIK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling