+207.2%
UMC vs TPG
-6.0%
+213.2%
-37.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | TPG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.6% | -1.1% | +5.7% | +4.6% |
| 7D | +5.0% | -2.4% | +7.4% | +5.1% |
| 30D | +7.7% | +11.1% | -3.4% | +7.0% |
| 3M | +1.7% | +26.3% | -24.6% | +0.9% |
| 6M | +113.9% | +18.3% | +95.6% | +110.5% |
| YTD | +168.9% | -14.4% | +183.3% | +142.4% |
| 1Y | +207.2% | -6.7% | +213.9% | +175.7% |
| All | +207.2% | -6.0% | +213.2% | +175.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside TPG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus TPG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × TPG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded TPG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling