+207.2%
UMC vs SSNC
-3.0%
+210.2%
-37.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | SSNC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.6% | -1.2% | +5.7% | +4.2% |
| 7D | +5.0% | +0.6% | +4.3% | +5.2% |
| 30D | +7.7% | +6.0% | +1.6% | +9.7% |
| 3M | +1.7% | +21.0% | -19.3% | +10.3% |
| 6M | +113.9% | +12.1% | +101.8% | +134.1% |
| YTD | +168.9% | -3.2% | +172.1% | +199.6% |
| 1Y | +207.2% | -4.4% | +211.6% | +245.4% |
| All | +207.2% | -3.0% | +210.2% | +245.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside SSNC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus SSNC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × SSNC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded SSNC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling