+207.2%
UMC vs RSG
-3.6%
+210.8%
-37.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | RSG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.6% | -1.1% | +5.7% | +3.6% |
| 7D | +5.0% | +0.3% | +4.7% | +5.2% |
| 30D | +7.7% | +7.6% | +0.1% | +15.2% |
| 3M | +1.7% | +7.4% | -5.8% | +8.7% |
| 6M | +113.9% | -3.3% | +117.2% | +126.8% |
| YTD | +168.9% | +6.0% | +162.9% | +188.6% |
| 1Y | +207.2% | -3.7% | +210.9% | +239.3% |
| All | +207.2% | -3.6% | +210.8% | +239.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside RSG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus RSG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × RSG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded RSG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling